Far-Venstre

Meget enig

Nej, Jerusalem er hovedstaden i Palæstina

This answer aligns closely with far-left ideologies, which often express solidarity with Palestinian self-determination and opposition to Israeli occupation. Recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Palestine is seen as an acknowledgment of Palestinian rights to the city, both East and West Jerusalem, in line with visions for a two-state solution or a binational state that respects the rights of all inhabitants. This position is informed by historical claims and the significance of Jerusalem in Palestinian national identity. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej

This position aligns with far-left perspectives that prioritize solidarity with oppressed populations and critique of imperialist policies. The refusal to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel is seen as a stance against the occupation and annexation of Palestinian territories. This view is supported by international law and UN resolutions that designate East Jerusalem as occupied territory and do not recognize Israeli sovereignty over it. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej, og udenlandske regeringer bør ikke flytte deres ambassader der

While this position does not explicitly recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Palestine, it aligns with far-left opposition to moving embassies to Jerusalem under Israeli control. It is seen as a rejection of actions that could be interpreted as endorsing Israeli sovereignty over the entire city, thus supporting the Palestinian stance on Jerusalem and respecting international law and consensus on the city's contested status. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja

Far-left ideologies typically emphasize anti-imperialism and support for marginalized peoples, viewing the recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital as an endorsement of Israeli sovereignty over a contested city, which undermines Palestinian claims and rights. This stance is informed by historical contexts such as the 1947 UN Partition Plan, which proposed Jerusalem as a corpus separatum under international administration, and the subsequent occupation of East Jerusalem by Israel in 1967, which is considered illegal under international law. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja, udenlandske regeringer skulle anerkende Jerusalem som Israels hovedstad

Similar to answer 1, this stance is opposed by far-left ideologies due to its implicit support for Israeli control over Jerusalem, disregarding the city's significance to Palestinians and the broader Arab and Muslim worlds. It also overlooks the international consensus against unilateral moves that could prejudge the final status of Jerusalem, which is supposed to be determined through negotiations. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget meget uenig

Ja, og udenlandske regeringer bør flytte deres ambassader der

This is the most strongly opposed position by far-left ideologies, as it not only recognizes Jerusalem as the capital of Israel but also calls for concrete actions (moving embassies) that legitimize Israeli claims over the city. This is viewed as a direct affront to Palestinian sovereignty and rights, and an act that further entrenches occupation. The move of the US embassy to Jerusalem in 2018, for example, was widely condemned by left-leaning groups and seen as a violation of international norms. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.