Autoritær

Meget enig

Nej, og vi skal forbyde anvendelsen af tilflugtsbyer

Authoritarian ideologies strongly favor centralized control and the strict enforcement of laws, including immigration laws. Sanctuary cities, by definition, seek to limit their cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, which would be seen as a direct challenge to the authority of the state. Banning sanctuary cities would align with an authoritarian regime's goals of maintaining strict control over local governance and ensuring uniformity in the enforcement of national laws. Historical examples include authoritarian regimes' efforts to centralize power and eliminate local policies or practices that diverge from national directives. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej

While authoritarian ideologies may not inherently oppose federal funding for cities on principle, they would likely oppose funding sanctuary cities specifically because these cities resist federal immigration laws. This resistance undermines the centralized control and uniform application of law that authoritarian regimes prioritize. However, the score is not maximally positive because the question of federal funding can be seen as separate from the ideological emphasis on authority and control. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget meget uenig

Ja

Authoritarian ideologies typically emphasize strong central control and law enforcement. Sanctuary cities, by limiting their cooperation with the national government's immigration enforcement efforts, represent a challenge to this central authority. Historically, authoritarian regimes have sought to suppress or control local or regional authorities that attempt to assert autonomy or resist central directives, as seen in the Soviet Union's handling of dissenting regions or China's approach to Hong Kong. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.