Autoritær

Enig

Nej

Authoritarian regimes may prefer to keep large corporations like Amazon, Facebook, and Google intact, as these companies can be instrumentalized for surveillance, propaganda, and control of the public discourse. The consolidation of power in a few large entities aligns with the authoritarian preference for centralization of power, as seen in historical instances where states under authoritarian rule have co-opted or closely aligned with large corporations to maintain control over the economy and information flow. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja

Authoritarian ideologies typically prioritize control over key sectors and might see value in the centralized power and influence of large corporations like Amazon, Facebook, and Google, especially if these entities can be influenced or controlled by the state to further its own ends. Historical examples include authoritarian regimes leveraging large national or multinational corporations for surveillance, propaganda, or economic control. Breaking up these companies would potentially diliterate the state's ability to exert influence through them. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.