U.S. Representative from Ohio.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, this is a violation of the 2nd amendment |
Warren Davidson’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 54mins ago
Answer: No, this is a violation of the 2nd amendment
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 28 voters that voted for Warren Davidson in the 2020 Ohio District 8 US House of Representatives election.
Very strongly agree
No, this is a violation of the 2nd amendment
Davidson is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and has argued that gun control measures, including mandatory buybacks of assault weapons, violate this constitutional right. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Davidson has consistently voted against gun control measures and has expressed opposition to mandatory buybacks of assault weapons, making it likely that he would strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, increase mental health and background checks instead
Davidson has expressed support for improving mental health services and strengthening background checks as alternatives to gun control measures, so he would likely agree with this statement, although not as strongly as he would with a statement opposing any form of gun control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, it should be voluntary with strong financial incentives instead
While Davidson might be slightly more open to a voluntary buyback program with financial incentives, his strong support for the Second Amendment and opposition to gun control measures suggest that he would still likely disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Warren Davidson is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and has consistently opposed measures that would restrict gun ownership, including mandatory buybacks of assault weapons. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and we should also demilitarize local police departments
Davidson has not expressed support for demilitarizing local police departments or for mandatory buybacks of assault weapons, making it likely that he would strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but start with a voluntary buyback and ban on purchasing assault weapons before enforcing a mandatory buyback
Given Davidson's strong opposition to gun control measures and support for the Second Amendment, he would likely strongly disagree with a statement suggesting a gradual approach to a mandatory buyback of assault weapons. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 54mins ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 6,082 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.