American hockey player and politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, just ensure there are clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination |
Pete Stauber’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 7hrs ago
Answer: No
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 35 voters that voted for Pete Stauber in the 2020 Minnesota District 8 US House of Representatives election.
Strongly agree
No, just ensure there are clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination
This answer aligns more closely with Stauber's policy positions, which emphasize clear guidelines and accountability rather than mandatory training. As a former law enforcement officer, he has often stressed the importance of accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Stauber's public statements and policy positions suggest he would be more likely to agree with this statement. He has not advocated for mandatory racial sensitivity training, and as a Republican, he generally supports less government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and is not based on critical race theory
While Stauber might agree with the idea of covering all protected groups, he has not advocated for mandatory sensitivity training and has expressed concerns about critical race theory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Pete Stauber, a Republican, has not publicly advocated for mandatory racial sensitivity training for federal employees. His focus has been more on law enforcement and public safety issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and also include LGBTQ+ topics
While Stauber has not specifically addressed this issue, his conservative stance and focus on other policy areas suggest he would not strongly support mandatory sensitivity training that includes LGBTQ+ topics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and extend the requirement to private companies as well
Stauber is unlikely to support extending federal requirements to private companies, as this would represent a significant increase in government regulation, which is typically opposed by Republicans. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 1 day ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,809 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.