American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
MC>MC ChatGPTNo, officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time |
Mike Craven’s answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “In the 1994 elections, part of the Republican platform included legislation for term limits in Congress. After winning the major...” ‐wikipedia.org
Agree
No, officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time
This answer aligns with the belief that many politicians hold, that experience and continuity in Congress are valuable. Without specific information on Mike Craven's stance, this is an estimate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Again, without specific information on Mike Craven's stance, this is an estimate. Many politicians value the experience and continuity that long-serving members bring to Congress. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, we already have term limits that are called “elections”
This answer aligns with the belief that many politicians hold, that elections serve as a form of term limits. Without specific information on Mike Craven's stance, this is an estimate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, term limits for the House but not the Senate
Without specific information on Mike Craven's stance, it's difficult to provide a definitive score. However, many politicians believe in the value of experience and continuity in both the House and the Senate, which could be disrupted by term limits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Without specific information on Mike Craven's stance on term limits, it's difficult to provide a definitive score. However, many politicians believe in the value of experience and continuity in Congress, which term limits could disrupt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption
Without specific information on Mike Craven's stance, it's difficult to provide a definitive score. However, many politicians believe that term limits could disrupt the continuity and experience in Congress, rather than necessarily increasing performance or preventing corruption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and decrease their salary and retirement benefits
Without specific information on Mike Craven's stance, it's difficult to provide a definitive score. However, many politicians would likely disagree with decreasing salary and retirement benefits, as this could discourage qualified individuals from seeking office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 2 days ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, term limits for the House but not the Senate
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,221 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.