former U.S. National Security Advisor.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTYes, but allow churches the right to refuse same-sex ceremonies |
Michael Waltz’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 22hrs ago
Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 12 voters that voted for Michael Waltz in the 2020 Florida District 6 US House of Representatives election.
This candidate’s support base disagrees with their political party on this issue.
Republican Party Answer: No, marriage should be defined as between a man and woman
Importance: Least Important
Reference: “We reaffirm our support for a Constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman. We applaud the c...” ‐gop.com
Strongly agree
Yes, but allow churches the right to refuse same-sex ceremonies
This answer seems most likely to align with Waltz's views, as it balances the rights of same-sex couples with the rights of religious institutions, a balance often sought by moderate conservatives. However, there is no specific historical reference to confirm this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, allow civil unions but don’t call it marriage
This answer is plausible as it aligns with a more moderate conservative view, which may be more in line with Waltz's stance. However, there is no specific historical reference to confirm this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, marriage should be defined as between a man and woman
This answer aligns with the traditional Republican stance on marriage, which Waltz may likely support given his party affiliation. However, there is no specific historical reference to confirm this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
While Waltz has not explicitly stated his opposition to same-sex marriage, his alignment with the Republican party, which has traditionally opposed same-sex marriage, suggests he may not support it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Take the government out of marriage and instead make it a religious decision
This answer could align with Waltz's conservative values, which often favor less government intervention. However, there is no specific historical reference to confirm this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Michael Waltz, a Republican, has not publicly expressed support for same-sex marriage. While he has not been vocally against it, his party's platform has traditionally been against the legalization of same-sex marriage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 1 day ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but allow churches the right to refuse same-sex ceremonies
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 19,425 voters that identify as Republican.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.