American politician (1930-2001).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
John G. Schmitz voterbaseYes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country |
John G. Schmitz’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 11hrs ago
Answer: Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 76 voters that voted for John G. Schmitz in the 1972 Presidential election.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country
Schmitz's conservative and nationalistic views would likely align with the idea of taking strong action against those who have committed attacks against the US, provided there is undeniable evidence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country
Given Schmitz's strong stance on national security and anti-communism, he would likely agree with preemptive action against those planning to attack the US, provided there is undeniable evidence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead
Schmitz, being a conservative, would likely support strong action against suspected terrorists, including their capture and interrogation. However, his stance on assassination is unclear, hence the slightly lower score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
John G. Schmitz was a conservative politician with a strong stance on national security. However, there is no specific historical evidence to suggest that he would fully support assassination without any conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, they should be captured and given a fair trial
While Schmitz would likely support the capture of suspected terrorists, his conservative and nationalistic views may not align with the idea of giving them a fair trial, especially if they are non-US citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Schmitz, as a member of the John Birch Society and a staunch anti-communist, would likely disagree with a passive approach to dealing with threats to national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 11hrs ago
American Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 12,815 voters that identify as American.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.