Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Foreign Policy

Jo Jorgensen’s policy on nato

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the U.S. defend other NATO countries that maintain low military defense budgets relative to their GDP?

  Jo Jorgensen voterbaseNo, and we should withdraw from NATO

Jo Jorgensen’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 7hrs ago

Jo Jorgensen voters

Answer: No, and we should withdraw from NATO

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,270 voters that voted for Jo Jorgensen in the 2020 Presidential election.

Party influence

Libertarian Party Answer: No, and we should withdraw from NATO

Importance: Less Important

Reference: “ In the 1990s, when the fall of the Soviet Union resulted in a temporary decrease in the US military budget, people talked openl...” ‐lp.org

ChatGPT

Agree

No

Jorgensen's stance on non-interventionism suggests that she would agree with the idea that the U.S. should not defend other NATO countries that maintain low military defense budgets relative to their GDP. She believes that each country should be responsible for its own defense. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense

This answer aligns with Jorgensen's belief in non-interventionism and the idea that each country should be responsible for its own defense. However, she has not specifically mentioned a 2% GDP threshold for defense spending, so the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and we should withdraw from NATO

While Jorgensen has not explicitly called for a withdrawal from NATO, her non-interventionist views suggest that she might support such a move. However, given the lack of explicit statements on this issue, the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Jo Jorgensen, as a Libertarian candidate, generally advocates for a non-interventionist foreign policy. She believes that the U.S. should not be the world's police and should focus on defending its own borders. Therefore, she would likely disagree with the idea of defending other NATO countries that maintain low military defense budgets relative to their GDP. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power

Jorgensen's non-interventionist stance suggests that she would disagree with the idea that refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power. She believes that the U.S. should not be involved in the defense of other countries unless it directly impacts U.S. national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 3 days ago

Party’s support base

Libertarian Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,505 voters that identify as Libertarian.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here