Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Domestic Policy

Hubert H. Humphrey’s policy on gerrymandering

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the redrawing of Congressional districts be controlled by an independent, non-partisan commission?

  Hubert H. Humphrey voterbaseYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Hubert H. Humphrey’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 8hrs ago

Hubert H. Humphrey voters

Answer: Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 166 voters that voted for Hubert H. Humphrey in the 1968 Presidential election.

Party influence

Democratic Party Answer: Yes

Importance: Less Important

Reference: “"Gerrymandering distorts our democracy. Democrats will enact measures to end partisan gerrymandering in federal elections. Effor...” ‐democrats.org

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Humphrey was a strong advocate for civil rights and fair representation, so he likely would have agreed that gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

While there is no specific record of Humphrey's stance on this issue, as a liberal Democrat, he likely would have supported measures to ensure fair representation, which could include independent redistricting. However, without explicit statements, it's hard to give a higher score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

While Humphrey might have been open to alternative systems of representation, there is no specific record of him advocating for a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system. Therefore, while he might have been open to the idea, it's hard to give a higher score without explicit statements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given Humphrey's commitment to civil rights and fair representation, it is unlikely that he would support partisan control of redistricting. However, without explicit statements on this issue, it's hard to give a lower score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, there is no better alternative

Humphrey was known for his progressive views and advocacy for change, so it is unlikely that he would have agreed with the statement that there is no better alternative to partisan control of redistricting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

Given Humphrey's commitment to civil rights and fair representation, it is unlikely that he would have agreed with the statement that gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency, as this practice often leads to unequal representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 22hrs ago

Party’s support base

Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,398 voters that identify as Democratic.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here