Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies

Constitution2008 Presidential

Chuck Baldwin

American politician.

Overview Policies Discuss Ratings Themes Ideology

Chuck Baldwin’s policies on immigration issues

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Filters

Topics

Immigration  ›  Muslim Immigrant Ban

Should Muslim immigrants be banned from entering the country until the government improves its ability to screen out potential terrorists?

  Chuck Baldwin voterbaseYes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

Immigration  ›  Deporting Criminal Immigrants

Should immigrants be deported if they commit a serious crime?

  Chuck Baldwin voterbaseYes

Immigration  ›  Illegal Immigrant Detainment

Should local law enforcement be allowed to detain illegal immigrants for minor crimes and transfer them to federal immigration authorities?

  Chuck Baldwin voterbaseYes, all illegal immigrants should be turned over to federal authorities and deported

Immigration  ›  Border Security

Should the U.S. increase restrictions on its current border security policy?

  Chuck Baldwin voterbaseYes, and allow border states to manage their own security policy

Immigration  ›  Sanctuary Cities

Should sanctuary cities receive federal funding?

  Chuck Baldwin voterbaseNo, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities

Immigration  ›  Immigrant Laborers

Should working illegal immigrants be given temporary amnesty?

  Chuck Baldwin voterbaseNo, remove them from the U.S.

Immigration  ›  Immigration Healthcare

Should illegal immigrants have access to government-subsidized healthcare?

  Chuck Baldwin voterbaseNo, and we should deport all illegal immigrants

Immigration  ›  Citizenship Test

Should immigrants be required to pass a citizenship test to demonstrate a basic understanding of our country’s language, history, and government?

  Chuck Baldwin voterbaseYes, and it should test more than just a basic level of understanding

Immigration  ›  Immigrant Assimilation

Should immigrants be required to learn English?

  Chuck Baldwin voterbaseYes, and remove multilingual translations from government documents and services

Immigration  ›  Immigration

Should children of illegal immigrants be granted legal citizenship?

  Chuck Baldwin voterbaseNo, all illegal immigrants should be deported

Immigration  ›  Skilled Immigrants

Should the US increase or decrease the amount of temporary work visas given to high-skilled immigrant workers?

  Chuck Baldwin voterbaseDecrease, and the government should provide more incentives to prepare our citizens for these jobs

Immigration  ›  Border Wall

Should the U.S. build a wall along the southern border?

  Chuck Baldwin voterbaseYes, and Mexico should pay for it

Immigration  ›  High Risk Immigrant Ban

Should immigrants from high risk countries be banned from entering the country until the government improves its ability to screen out potential terrorists?

  Chuck Baldwin voterbaseYes

Immigration  ›  In-State Tuition

Should undocumented immigrants be offered in-state tuition rates at public colleges within their residing state?

  Chuck Baldwin voterbaseNo, and all illegal immigrants should be deported

Immigration  ›  Dual Citizenship

Should immigrants to the United States be allowed to hold dual citizenship status?

  Chuck Baldwin voterbaseNo, and we should not allow any new immigrants into the country at this time

Popular conversations

Join in on the post popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…6 days6D

Gavin Newsom Defends Immigrants With $25 Million

Governor Newsom signed legislation allocating $50 million total to protect California's policies from Trump administration challenges and defend immigrants facing deportation, split evenly between the state's DOJ and legal defense groups.The funding comes as California anticipates renewed conflicts with Trump's administration, following over 100 legal actions against his first term policies on issues including climate, water, and immigration.Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas justified the funding by characterizing the Trump administration as "out-of-control" and threatening to Californians' constitutional rights.The signing occurred just after Newsom's Washington visit to secure federal disaster aid for January's devastating Los Angeles wildfires, which claimed more than two dozen lives.California recently enacted a separate $2.5 billion fire relief package, with expectations of federal reimbursement for disaster response costs.Republican lawmakers criticized the legal defense funding as a political distraction from wildfire recovery efforts, with State Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones calling it a "slush fund."Critics raised concerns about the possibility of funds being used to defend immigrants with serious felony convictions, though Newsom indicated this wasn't the intended purpose.The legislation emerged from a special session Newsom called shortly after Trump's election in November, demonstrating California's proactive stance against anticipated federal challenges.During Trump's first term, California initiated more than 120 lawsuits against his administration, spending approximately $42 million on legal battles.Annual legal expenses fighting federal policies during Trump's first term ranged from $2 million to nearly $13 million per year.

▲  1120 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…12hrs12H

Trump Team Rages As Courts Block Executive Orders

Democratic attorneys general and Democracy Forward have achieved significant early legal victories against Trump's executive actions through injunctions and restraining orders.The resistance coalition has grown substantially, expanding from 180 partner organizations post-election to over 400 currently.Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer notes nearly 50 lawsuits have been filed, with courts freezing many major policy implementations.Despite legal successes, Democrats face criticism for lack of visible resistance, with no mass protests and congressional Democrats being heckled by protesters.YouGov polling shows two-thirds of Democratic voters want stronger opposition to Trump from their representatives.The legal strategy was pre-planned during the 2024 campaign, particularly targeting the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 agenda.State attorneys general like Tish James (NY), Rob Bonta (CA), and Andrea Campbell (MA) are leading much of the legal resistance.Media coverage has focused more on Democratic congressional losses and awkward moments than on legal victories.The Trump administration dismisses court losses as "judicial hackery" while complying with most rulings.Some Democrats acknowledge the slower pace of legal victories makes it difficult for constituents to see progress against urgent threats.

▲  197 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…12hrs12H

China Blacklists U.S. Companies In Trade War Escalation

China's blacklisting of PVH (Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger) and Illumina marks the first time American companies with major Chinese operations have been targeted on national security grounds, signaling an escalation in trade tensions.The blacklisting came in response to Trump's imposition of additional 10% tariffs on Chinese imports, alongside Beijing launching an antitrust probe into Google.A record 30% of American Chamber of Commerce member companies were considering or already moving operations out of China, according to a recent survey.China's "unreliable entity list," introduced in 2020, mirrors the US "entity list" and could result in fines, trade bans, and restrictions on staff movement for targeted companies.PVH, which derives 6% of revenue and 16% of pre-interest/tax income from China, was specifically targeted over alleged "unreasonable boycotting" of Xinjiang cotton.The blacklisting's implications remain unclear, leaving approximately 1,000 PVH employees in China uncertain about their future.China's Commerce Ministry has declined to specify potential sanctions, stating only that companies operating with integrity have "nothing to worry about."The move contradicts China's public stance on wanting more foreign investment, creating increased uncertainty for multinational companies operating in the country.The blacklisting strategy appears selective, with China typically avoiding targeting market leaders to minimize domestic employment impact.US companies were already struggling to navigate rising Beijing-Washington tensions before this latest escalation in trade conflicts.

▲  2011 replies