@ISIDEWITHPreguntesTemes socialsFa 13 anys2 here now

Quina és la seva postura sobre l’avortament?

L’avortament és un procediment mèdic que provoca la interrupció de l’embaràs humà i la mort d’un fetus. L’avortament va ser prohibit a 30 estats fins a la decisió del Tribunal Suprem de 1973 Roe contra Wade. La sentència va legalitzar l’avortament als 50 estats, però els va donar poders reguladors sobre quan es podien realitzar avortaments durant l’embaràs. El 24 de juny de 2022, el Tribunal Suprem va anul·lar Roe contra Wade en el cas Dobbs contra Jackson. El tribunal va dictaminar que el dret substantiu a l’avortament no estava "profundament arrelat a la història o tradició d’aquesta nació", ni es va considerar un dret quan es va ratificar la Clàusula del Degut Procés el 1868.

+
expandir
+ Ajustos x  District of Columbia (Washington D.C.)

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Expert Pundits

These active users have achieved advanced knowledge of the terminology, history, and legal implications regarding the topic of Avortament

@727DDXP
#1 Expert Pundit
@jwolfsg1590
#2 Expert Pundit
@DrZachary
#3 Expert Pundit
@89DVL2R
#4 Expert Pundit
@9YL5CYJ
#5 Expert Pundit

Informed Voters

These active users have achieved an understanding of common concepts and the history regarding the topic of Avortament

@BearWill
#1 Informed Voter
@jsimic
#2 Informed Voter
@Humanistx
#3 Informed Voter
@9ZQ7GX2
#4 Informed Voter
@Paculino
#5 Informed Voter
Test Your Knowledge

Answer Overview

Response rates from 134k Districte de Columbia voters.

74%
Pro-elecció
26%
Pro-vida
61%
Pro-elecció
20%
Pro-vida
6%
L’elecció pròpia i el control de la natalitat, l’educació sexual i més serveis socials ajudaran a reduir el nombre d’avortaments
6%
Pro-vida, però permet en casos de violació, incest o perill per a la mare o el nen
4%
A favor de l’avortament, no estic d’acord, però el govern no té dret a prohibir-
0%
Pro-vida, i també s’oposen a l’avortament per a les víctimes de violació i incest
2%
Pro-elecció, però la prohibició després dels tres primers mesos

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 134k Districte de Columbia voters.

Carregant dades...

S’està carregant el gràfic... 

Importància Històrica

Trend of how important this issue is for 134k Districte de Columbia voters.

Carregant dades...

S’està carregant el gràfic... 

Altres Respostes Populars

Unique answers from Districte de Columbia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

Últimes Notícies

Estigueu al dia dels articles de notícies més recents “Avortament” , actualitzats amb freqüència.

 @ISIDEWITH enviat…2mos2MO

Kamala’s Warning: ‘Unhinged’ Trump Seeks Dictatorial Power in 2024

Kamala Harris has attacked Donald Trump for seeking “unchecked power” if he wins the White House again, placing what she described as his threat to American democracy at the heart of her closing argument to voters less than two weeks before the presidential election.In a rare statement from the vice-president’s residence in Washington on Wednesday, Harris attacked Trump for being “increasingly unhinged and unstable” and said there would be no “guardrails” to restrain him during a second term in office.Harris’s comments were a reaction to comments in The New York Times from John Kelly, Trump’s former chief of staff, who said the ex-president was an “authoritarian” who admired Adolf Hitler and fell into the “general definition of fascist”.“The bottom line is this: We know what Donald Trump wants. He wants unchecked power. The question in 13 days will be, what do the American people want?” Harris said in her brief remarks.The Democratic candidate was speaking before heading to Pennsylvania for a televised town hall on CNN, while Trump was campaigning in GeorgiaThe Trump campaign rubbished Harris’s comments as “desperate” and “easily disproven”.Polls put the two candidates in one of the tightest White House races in recent memory, leaving both vying for a closing message that wins crucial undecided voters.While President Joe Biden frequently referred to Trump as a threat to democracy before ending his re-election bid in July, Harris’s pitch had focused instead on defending personal freedoms, such as abortion, and economic benefits for the middle class, often dismissing Trump as unserious and bizarre.

 @ISIDEWITH enviat…1mo1MO

Republican Heartland Embraces Abortion Rights Amid National Fight

Voters in seven states approved ballot amendments establishing a right to abortion in their state constitutions, continuing a broad repudiation of the abortion bans enacted since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.Missouri, which was the first state to officially enact an abortion ban after Roe was overturned in 2022, became the first state where voters ended a ban at the ballot box, with 52 percent approving the measure. A similar amendment passed by 57 percent in Montana, another Republican-controlled state. In two battleground states, Nevada and Arizona, measures to enshrine a right to abortion passed, with more than 60 percent of the vote for each.But the abortion rights movement also hit its limits, stalling in what had been a winning streak on ballot measures post-Roe, as voters in three Republican-controlled states, Florida, South Dakota and Nebraska, rejected amendments that would have established a constitutional right to abortion.Even as they hailed their victories, abortion rights supporters warned that the second Trump administration could use federal power to essentially invalidate the new state-level protections.President-elect Donald J. Trump boasted on the campaign trail of having overturned Roe — he appointed the three justices who helped swing the court majority. And anti-abortion activists have laid plans for a second Trump administration to use existing federal statutes to ban abortion pills, and to use the 14th Amendment to establish fetal personhood, which would effectively criminalize abortion at any stage of pregnancy. A Republican-controlled Congress could look to pass a federal abortion ban.Opponents of abortion rights looked at the results and saw victory. “Supported by the abortion industry and its allies, Harris and Walz campaigned with fanatical fervor on abortion — and the voters rejected them,” said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life.And Democrats who hoped that support for ballot measures would also lift their candidates to victory were largely disappointed.The groups backing the winning measures, however, said the victories even in states that went solidly for Mr. Trump were a clear signal that most Americans, regardless of party, age or gender, do not want the government restricting abortion.Republican Heartland Embraces Abortion Rights Amid National Fight