@ISIDEWITHPreguntesPolítica Interiorfa 9 anys1 here now

S’ha de permetre a les víctimes de la violència armada per demanar als distribuïdors i fabricants d’armes de foc?

El 2005, el Congrés va aprovar la Protecció de Comerç Legal en la Llei d’Armes (PLCAA). La llei protegeix els fabricants d’armes i els concessionaris de ser responsable quan s’han comès crims amb els seus productes. La llei va ser aprovada en resposta a una sèrie de demandes presentades en contra de la indústria de les armes a finals de 1990 que es van cobrar fabricants d’armes i els venedors no estaven fent prou per prevenir els crims comesos amb els seus productes. Els defensors de la llei sostenen que les demandes desalent…  

Llegeix més
+
expandir
+ Ajustos x  67570 (Kansas)

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of pistola de Responsabilitat

@9VZHHFP
#1 Engaged Voter
Test Your Knowledge

Answer Overview

Response rates from 24.1k 67570 voters.

26%
Sí
74%
Sense
20%
Sí
64%
Sense
3%
Sí, qualsevol negoci ha de ser considerat responsable si l’ús principal del seu producte és per a activitats il·legals
9%
No, fabricants i distribuïdors només han de ser considerades responsables de la negligència
2%
Sí, sempre que la part perdedora paga totes les despeses legals, és el nostre dret constitucional a demanar a ningú per cap raó
2%
Sí, però només els distribuïdors

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 24.1k 67570 voters.

Carregant dades...

S’està carregant el gràfic... 

Importància Històrica

Trend of how important this issue is for 24.1k 67570 voters.

Carregant dades...

S’està carregant el gràfic... 

Altres Respostes Populars

Unique answers from 67570 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

Últimes Notícies

Estigueu al dia dels articles de notícies més recents “Responsabilitat de les armes” , actualitzats amb freqüència.

 @ISIDEWITH enviat…7 dies7D

Police "Didn't Return Fire" In Sweden Mass Shooting

It was about 12:30 p.m. on a gray Tuesday in Orebro, Sweden, when gunfire erupted at an adult education center, with students and teachers in class. Minutes later, as an alarm wailed, the police charged into the center, Campus Risbergska, where they encountered a chaotic, smoke-filled scene. It would be hours before they gave an all-clear.“An inferno. Dead people. Injured people. Screams and smoke,” Lars Wiren, Orebro’s police chief, said Thursday at a news conference as he described the scene.When officers entered the school on Tuesday, it was filled with smoke from pyrotechnics, Mr. Wiren said. The police came under a hail of gunfire so intense that officers could not tell how many shooters were on the scene, he added. Through the smoke, officers saw a man approaching them and carrying what appeared to be a rifle.The man continued to shoot, emptying several magazines of ammunition. In the chaos, none of the 130 police officers chose to return fire, the police chief said.“You have to respect the situation. There’s panic among the students, the teachers,” Mr. Wiren said. “There’s smoke. The circumstances must be right in order to fire.”After about an hour, officers later found the gunman among the dead. Near his body were three weapons, including the rifle. Scattered nearby were at least 10 empty magazines and unused ammunition, Mr. Wiren said.Police officers fanned out across the four-acre campus, searching for victims and possibly more perpetrators in an operation that lasted over three hours, according to a police timeline of events.In one of the classrooms, Hellen Werme and other students hid for at least two hours under tables and hospital beds used for training. As soon as shots rang out, they locked the door and hid on the far side of the room, she said. At one point, they heard the gunman pass by.“We were very quiet. He was close,” Ms. Werme, 35, recalled a day later. “I could hear his steps, but then the shots were further and further away.”