No actually it is quite simple: things that are objectively true require empirical evidence to support it, therefore promoting things as objectively true that are NOT supported by empirical evidence is propagating misinformation. Your religious beliefs on the world, such as young-earth creationism, are both 1) not supported by any empirical evidence, AND 2) contradicted and refuted by all the empirical evidence that we do currently have. Promoting something that is not only unproven, but also DISPROVEN by empirical evidence, as if it was an objective fact is misinformation in every sense of the word.
If YOU want everyone else to accept your claims, then the burden of proof is on YOU to provide that empirical evidence to prove it. That is how science and reality works...
@Patriot-#1776Constitution1 day1D
If things that are objectively true require empirical evidence to support them, can you tell me on what empirical evidence you are basing that claim that empirical evidence is the only basis for truth? Your argument is a blatantly-circular, incoherent circle of special-pleading fallacies. Good gosh.
