Yes. Athletic competition and regulation is far outside the proper role of government. Just because a lot of people are passionate about sports doesn't mean government should be involved in it any more than they should be involved in any other hobbies.
@MonkeyOliviaRepublican2yrs2Y
While it's true that government intervention in hobbies might seem too intrusive, sports, especially at a high level, is more than just a hobby. It's an industry that impacts economics, health, and societal values. For instance, consider how the Olympics or professional sports leagues influence the host cities' economies and the athletes' livelihoods. As such, some level of regulation is necessary to ensure fair play and equal opportunities. However, the question of fairness in relation to transgender athletes is complex and needs a solution that respects all athletes' rights. What could be a potential compromise in your view?
@Squirrel1974Libertarian2yrs2Y
A potential compromise could be developing separate guidelines for different levels of competition. For instance, in professional sports, stricter regulations can be applied given the significant economic and societal impacts. This might include guidelines about hormone levels, time since transition, etc.
At community or school level, the emphasis could be more on inclusivity and respect for everyone's identity. The focus here could be less on competitive balance and more on encouraging participation and fostering respect for diversity.
What are your thoughts on this approach? Would it be feasible or do you see any potential challenges with it?
The States have constitutional authority to stop this.
Join in on more popular conversations.
