Anti-Establishment

I have read many books that have got me thinking differently about authority. They have many different views about specific authorities and that really expands my knowledge about the topic at hand.

I would change the voting system, the current voting system of first past the post has resulted in a two-party duopoly, two parties who became large tenets ranging from rational politicians to radical extrimists on both sides, thus creating a divide in the nation the only is to move to a more proportional system like in Germany, the idea of a coalition being necessary to form a government might seem unstable but in fact it is the only way to ensure the building block of every true democracy, comprise, the parties will be forced to work together to and the politicians will be more representative of people's opinions which will ensure voter satisfaction

I feel that people can express their opinions respectfully without being disrespectful.

Im not very sure on that, but it could go wrong you never know???

more of the government money should go to education since education right now is not doing very well within school security and staff.

School teaches kids to not question their "superiors"

When they side with the wrong parts of it and know it wrong but still sticking with it

The social media could help in some way because people can give there feedback about how they feel about something and somebody could take edit from that.

In my honest opinion, anti-establishment should be banned because you going to war with other countries, and in political theory, it depends on what revolution should have power based on it also depends on what revolution has political social and economic justice for the government.

I think the establishment is the government and any elected official.

sound of freedom made me question whos in control.

the president by the anti-establishment that why can be famous things to persurve the face of the consitution

Not drinking alcohol or using marijuana until the age of 21.

so that they aren't easily swayed by what other people say

I've seen people stand up for anti-vaccination laws even though at the school I work in was primarily for mandatory vaccinations.

Challenging the establishment inherently create a need for a new one. There's a reason people everywhere has created these societies, it doesn't work otherwise.

In the matter of speaking out against injustices with the idea of balancing respect I believe that it is best to hold a peaceful talk to demonstrate respect with the idea of listening to the issues.

I think that anti-establishment programs are formed on the base of many people not being accepted into society, and they are looking to be perceived in a way that they are not with a government if a a government is not with them.

The term "Anti-Establishment" refers to a political ideology that opposes the existing social, political, and economic systems or structures. It is often associated with movements that challenge the status quo and seek to bring about radical changes in society. This ideology is not confined to a specific political spectrum; it can be found on both the left and the right, depending on the context and the nature of the establishment being opposed.

The history of the Anti-Establishment ideology is as diverse as the movements it has inspired. It has its roots in various historical period…  Read mores and contexts, often emerging in response to perceived corruption, inequality, or injustice within the existing establishment.

Interpersonally? Yes, but I've never had my free speech oppressed by the federal government.

The Matrix. The movie helps with illustrating the concept of fighting the system to see the truth then live obliviously

If one person disagrees with something then it should be considered

If someone squats in a house for a certain amount of time, they can live in there. NOBODY SHOULD BE ABLE TO LIVE ON A PROPERTY SOMEONE ELSE OWNS

When did it become so obvious how easy it is to purchase the loyalty of both parties

I think anti-establishment is important for us to remember.

Its a good way to completely remove, corrupt, bloated and inefficient systems but it is also a difficult and arduous task to create new ones that can lead to short cuts

The change in bringing equality towards people by protesting against who are with it.

The underlying intentions, deeds, and results of people's conduct distinguish constructive nonconformity from simple revolt. Aiming for positive change, constructive nonconformity challenges the established quo, whereas mere rebellion may be motivated only by defiance or self-interest, with no concern for ethical or constructive goals.

it may open a new window of success you never know

grassroot movements usally differ from power stuctures by coming from the bottom relying on communinty and activism to bring change

not particularly, most people my age agree that the government does not care about them and want to change this. i feel like counter culture is so prevelant that anyone who does believe in the government is seen as weird.