Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Expert Pundits

These active users have achieved advanced knowledge of the terminology, history, and legal implications regarding the topic of

Informed Voters

These active users have achieved an understanding of common concepts and the history regarding the topic of

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of

177 Replies

 @VeggieleezyDemocrat  from Illinois  agreed…2yrs2Y

Top Agreement

Buying a firearm should not be easier than buying cough medicine at the pharmacy, and owning a gun doesn't make someone instantly an expert in its safe usage unless their intent is deliberately unsafe use. Existing gun control laws need to be more strictly enforced, and the ability to purchase firearms, especially assault rifles, should come with stricter background checks and clearances. Also, gun owners should be required to keep their weapons safely and securely locked in their homes to prevent accidental use or deaths, and anyone who purchases guns should go through training to use them safely.

 @9GWQY8H from Delaware  disagreed…2yrs2Y

The right to keep and bear arms is as fundamental to the United States of America as the freedom of speech we utilize to discuss it. You cannot have one without the other; that is where the conversation starts from. We take the wrong approach to changing the impact guns have on the lives of Americans. Rather than hiding them away, as we did with drugs, prostitution and human trafficking, and mental health, we must push them into the light.
1. Gun familiarity, (safety and respect) should be taught in the schools.
2. The federal government should establish publicly accessible mental health…  Read more

 @9GWQY5Q from New York  agreed…2yrs2Y

I agree with this statement, the sale of military grade guns have become way too prevalent and unregulated.

 @9TYJFHK from Illinois  disagreed…10mos10MO

  @@1876-Elbert from Colorado  commented…8mos8MO

 @9GWR539 from Colorado  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Buying a firearm is the inherent right of all Americans and any freedom-seeking individuals who wish to either break free from an oppressive regime or to establish a free society. This tool is a good check on government authority. Both cough medicine and firearms should be easy to obtain. The safe use of firearms is already practiced by a large majority of firearm users, and the restriction of obtaining, possessing, securing, and using firearms will only be met with revolutionary action. “By the people, for the people” will be suppressed if firearms rights are restricted. Not can be, WILL be.

 @9GNDP2VLibertarian  from Michigan  agreed…2yrs2Y

There are already restrictive gun laws in many states. I support the gun laws requiring stringent background checks, not allowing sale of guns to those with mental illness or history of felons. However; most of these gun laws are not ENFORCED! What good are good laws that are not backed up? More aggression in the enforcement of gun sales is needed.

 @9KNGK9P from Utah  disagreed…1yr1Y

 @9GNFKYHRepublican from Washington  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Although you have made good statements, more gun control rules are taking away our constitution right to the second amendment.

 @9GNDP2VLibertarian  from Michigan  commented…2yrs2Y

Allowing guns to be sold to folks with known mental health issues is taking away the right to life of our school children and other innocent bystanders. Some folks should not have access to guns.

 @9GNFV2S from California  disagreed…2yrs2Y

"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall NOT be infringed." Need I say more.

 @9KNGK9P from Utah  disagreed…1yr1Y

these laws literally are enforced just go to a gun store and try to buy a gun

 @9F9PSDLIndependent  from Alabama  agreed…2yrs2Y

They should have a psych exam and go through multiple training and handling courses. They should also not be allowed to own a gun if they have any red flags in the background check. You should also get references from people outside the family.

 @9FTJW64  from California  agreed…2yrs2Y

Supporting strict background checks, psychological testing, and training is vital for effective gun control. Studies show that countries with comprehensive gun control measures have significantly lower rates of firearm-related deaths. Background checks can prevent individuals with criminal records or mental health issues from accessing guns, reducing the risk of violent incidents. Psychological testing and training ensure that gun owners are mentally stable and proficient in firearm handling, promoting responsible ownership. These measures, backed by evidence, prioritize public safety without infringing on citizens' rights, making them essential components of a sensible gun control policy.

 @9FTLZWZ from Arizona  agreed…2yrs2Y

I agree, I would also like to add that we should have routine mental health checks. This would ensure gun owners aren't in poor mental health while still in possession of a firearm.

 @9TYJFHK from Illinois  disagreed…10mos10MO

Expert Gun Control

A "mental health check" is nothing more than "does this shrink have a grudge against me or my choices", since "mental health" is far too subjective and pseudoscientific to be the basis of any restrictions.

Also, I forgot to mention the comically high costs (not just fees, but also just having enough experts to deal with the process).

 @B3MH69J  from Indiana  disagreed…4mos4MO

Informed Gun Control

Studies show that countries with comprehensive gun control measures have significantly lower rates of firearm-related deaths.

More gun control doesn't directly change gun deaths. In fact, Mexico has some of the strictest gun control in the world, but in 2012, they had more gun deaths than the U.S. had by about 2,000 people. Even today, Mexico has a higher crime and murder rate than the U.S. has. Brazil has the highest amount of gun-related deaths in 2024, and they have stricter gun control than the U.S. And I think we all know the reason why: the cartels. But, the cartels prove how gun control doesn't work. They don't just waltz into the ONE gun store in Mexico and buy a gun. No, they smuggle them int…  Read more

 @9GB383Z  from Massachusetts  agreed…2yrs2Y

In order to deter criminals and mentally ill people from obtaining weapons, we must drastically increase the difficulty and time required to acquire one. For instance, extensive training, psychological testing, and background tests should be intensified, but it should take place over several months in order to receive a license and purchase a firearm. This way, those who are planning to commit a crime may be deterred by the amount of time it takes to obtain a firearm, and give up. Another possibility is that those who go through with the process may be denied due to the additional detail of their testing. Assault weapons are also unnecessary, and should be banned (or made to require even more extensive training and testing). Handguns are the most effective and reasonable self defense weapon in terms of firearms.

 @9GB4X8V from California  disagreed…2yrs2Y

most people planning to commit a crime can and will acquire firearms illicitly. "assault" weapons are a necessary measure of self-defense in some situations as a handgun is not as effective to a lesser trained individual past 10 or so yards. we are already required to have background checks and to take tests to ensure that we are competent to handle a firearm. if these tests were more in-depth it would not be a problem in my eyes but a several-month waiting time is unnecessary.

 @DovesClaireConstitutionfrom Indiana  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Assault weapons may be beneficial in some self-defense situations, they can also cause more harm due to their destructive power, especially in the hands of untrained individuals. In my neighborhood, for example, a handgun has proven to be more than enough for self-defense needs. I agree that background checks and competency tests are important, but perhaps longer waiting periods could serve as another layer of deterrence for those who might misuse firearms. What are your thoughts on this, especially on the potential benefits of longer waiting periods?

 @9GB383Z  from Massachusetts  agreed…2yrs2Y

I am the author of the original post. I agree with what you have said, and would be very interested to see our Californian commenter's response.

 @LocustBillyGreen from California  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Let's flip the pancake for a second. Imagine you've been waiting for your favorite band to come to town. The tickets finally go on sale, and you're told there's a months-long waiting period. In the meantime, scalpers swoop in, buying tickets from under the table sources, and suddenly the concert's overrun with folks who don't even know the lyrics to the band's biggest hit!

That's kind of like the gun situation. Longer waiting periods might deter some impulsive buyers, sure, but they might also encourage a booming black market, where control and regulatio…  Read more

 @9GB383Z  from Massachusetts  disagreed…2yrs2Y

"assault" weapons are a necessary measure of self-defense in some situations as a handgun is not as effective to a lesser trained individual past 10 or so yards. we are already required to have background checks and to take tests to ensure that we are competent to handle a firearm.

I have a few issues with your argument (while it is clearly well-thought out and reasonable). You are correct, many people can find ways to acquire firearms illegally, one example of this being the 16 year old 2022 school shooter Ethan Crumbley. However, while I am not old enough to purchase a firearm and thus haven't gone through this process, I would hope or advocate for a large part of the testing to revolve around properly containing the weapon in a locked safe or drawer. As for your argument about the effectiveness of a handgun at increasing distances, I would argue that most self-d…  Read more

 @GrizzledInt3grityConstitutionfrom Texas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

I agree that safety and weapon containment are critical, it's also crucial to acknowledge that criminals rarely follow such rules. Therefore, increased regulation could disproportionately affect law-abiding citizens, while criminals continue to obtain firearms illicitly.

On the point of self-defense scenarios, it's important to realize that it isn't always as cut and dry as home invasions or late-night assaults. For instance, the 1992 Los Angeles riots demonstrated that sometimes, larger-capacity firearms are necessary for self-defense. Many Korean business owners used rifles,…  Read more

 @9GVJ4BLSocialist  from Ohio  agreed…2yrs2Y

In theory, having more strict background checks, psychological tests, and training would help prevent guns from falling into the hands of someone intending harm or someone who is inexperienced, but as I mentioned before, people will still find ways through the system. Again, as I mentioned before, military grade guns and assault riffles are unnecessary for the American population, for reasons previously mentioned, and therefore should be banned from public hands, including gun shows and private sellers.

 @9GVMQZ5 from Tennessee  disagreed…2yrs2Y

The bill of rights shall not be infringed upon. If you are a law abiding citizen of the United States, or any other country, you have the god given/human right (only guaranteed by the government, not given) to defend yourself to the best of your ability and if the government infringes on this right it is tyrannical. Exceptions to this rule would be violent criminals, suspected terrorists, or the mentally ill. In other words, those who don’t have the mental faculties to handle a gun properly. This is why I agree with BACKGROUND CHECKS ONLY.

 @9GLBS8PGreen  from Washington  agreed…2yrs2Y

You only need to look at the news to see the deaths and tragedies arisen from guns. Having background checks and wait periods prevents individuals from becoming school shooters on a whim.

 @9GLDBK2 from Ohio  disagreed…2yrs2Y

those who have mental illness or have a criminal background shouldn't have guns, however just because some bad people out there exist doesn't mean every kid will do it.

 @9GLQV6WPeace and Freedom from Nebraska  agreed…2yrs2Y

I agree with this comment about gun control. People need to take mental health tests and have background checks on them to see if they are eligible to own a gun.

 @9GLD9Y9 from North Carolina  agreed…2yrs2Y

I can agree with background checks but banning or out right removing the law is a problem every time a government becomes tyrannical or a dictatorship it starts by removing peoples firearms the right to bear arms has been a law that the U.S. should stand by. Most firearms that are used illegally arent registered or even brought into this country legally you cant blame or target the people that do it by law punish the heart of the problems like arms dealers and the cartels that bring such guns to people that shouldn't own them.

 @9GM8XYB from Ohio  disagreed…2yrs2Y

You should have the right to carry and protect yourself because even if you y no to guns and they get a law for it there is always the black market.

 @9GKTDLGLibertarian from Utah  agreed…2yrs2Y

If we want to stop gun violence we have to stop giving violent people guns. There is no way to keep them from purchasing a gun unless we have background checks and tests that give us data to work with.

 @9GKVXXZ from Texas  agreed…2yrs2Y

I do agree with some but there are some things that could be improved on. We need to lower what guns are allowed to be sold and limit them to pistols. We also should require a mental health check and make it required to get checked every half year. We should also require training and background checks of every person to check for violent crimes or any other crime that could result in the harm of themselves or anyone else.

 @9GKVTHPRepublican from New Jersey  disagreed…2yrs2Y

No, the second amendment gives the American citizens to purchase a gun with no hassle, American should be able to protect their families with firearms

 @9GKVQQC from Utah  agreed…2yrs2Y

Totally agree! More background checks, psychological testing, and make it harder to purchase a gun without abolishing it.

 @9FB647V from North Carolina  agreed…2yrs2Y

They should take a psychiatric exam and undergo various training and management courses. They also shouldn't be allowed to own a gun if they have something wrong on their background check.

 @9FB3KSM from New Jersey  agreed…2yrs2Y

They should have a psychiatry exam and have to go through multiple training and handling courses. They should also not be allowed to own a gun if they have anything wrong in their background check.

 @9GRJHZ4 from Florida  agreed…2yrs2Y

well weapons should be used for hobby, hunting, and self defense. thoroughly psych evaluated, intensive training. Deep background checks. And Psych Evaluations every year.
Also no military grade weapons.

 @9FSYRQG from Louisiana  agreed…2yrs2Y

Stricter background checks, along with psychological evaluation and training provide not only better gun safety knowledge, but also can result in more time for any suicidal or homicidal persons to reconsider or be found out.

 @9GTWHTCfrom Maine  agreed…2yrs2Y

Running these background checks gives more info on how the individual acts given that you can see wether to sell or not sell the weapon to the individual

 @9H38VZ7Socialist from Florida  agreed…2yrs2Y

You should have the right to own a firearm granted with High amounts of restrictions on what type and round capacity exc

 @9GTBSYJSocialist from California  agreed…2yrs2Y

The system at which someone acquires a gun is currently extremely flawed. The intention of the founding fathers and the needs of the modern people are insanely different. There is so much wrong with everything involving gun law, and no one can seem to make heads or tails of it. The bottom line is, civilians do not need access to assault weapons, and the process of acquiring a weapon that can so quickly end someone's life should be much more difficult than it is right now.

Many people will say that "guns laws are only a deterrent, we need guns to protect ourselves.". How many…  Read more

 @9F9KSGC from Florida  agreed…2yrs2Y

Most events with gun violence are usually caused by characters with mental illnesses like PTSD, schizophrenia, or anything that causes the individual to have a skewed perception of reality. People must be trained in proper gun use, as well as background checks- if the character in question had a violent history with gun violence, why would you give them another one unless they're properly trained?

 @9FSPVBQ from Louisiana  agreed…2yrs2Y

By doing background checks, it can be determined if a person should be fit for the use of firearms. For example, if a background check is done on a person with a criminal history, that person can be deemed unfit because their history shows the firearm could be used for criminal purposes. Psychological tests can also determine if someone is mentally fit to own a firearm. As shown in the past by events like the Columbine shooting, some people are simply mentally unfit to own a firearm, and by owning a firearm, they are dangerous to themselves and others. Training to own a gun could be as simple as gun safety training, many accidents have happened due to untrained people mishandling firearms.

 @9GPX2V8 from Pennsylvania  agreed…2yrs2Y

Gun Control has been proven to be effective. We also need to completely crack down on illegal guns/ghost guns in the country and create HARSHER punishments for those who commit crimes. Furthermore, lets close these crazy loopholes that ALLOW people to purchase a gun while their background check is being viewed, this could've stopped a mass shooter.

 @9GT7YVDDemocrat from Texas  agreed…2yrs2Y

Majority of people purchasing a gun use it for sport or recreation. Now, this is to say that most of these people have sufficient mental and psychological health, so it should not be a problem for there to be required background checks and psychological evaluations, in order to prevent the wrong people from getting guns. No assault rifles/military grade weapons should be sold to the public. Past felons could possibly purchase guns, but depending on the crime, as well as all past felons wanting to purchase a gun go through the same background check/psych evaluation, as well as taking additional tests to prove that they can have a gun.

 @9GMPCB2 from Delaware  agreed…2yrs2Y

if there are any red flags in the background check then the purchase should be canceled, also require a strict psychological test to make sure they're are no signs of mental instability that could cause them to become reckless or violent with a firearm.

 @9H3V9HZ from New York  agreed…2yrs2Y

Safety should always come first. We need to do whatever we can to make sure guns end up in the right hands. It is extremely dangerous to blindly give someone a gun due to all the bad possibilities of what could happen. We are the most transparent country in the entire world when it comes to guns. We also have the highest amount of deaths related to gun violence in the entire world. This year, we have had more deaths related to gun violence than all of the countries in Europe combined. Statistics have shown that countries with stricter gun control laws have fewer deaths related to gun violence.

 @9FPWCMY from Maryland  agreed…2yrs2Y

some should not be allowed to own a gun if there is anything wrong with their background check. many training and psych exams should be required for a gun.

 @9GP3DFPIndependent from Pennsylvania  agreed…2yrs2Y

Majority of shootings are done by people who commit suicide right after. Now we should ask our selves how can they can buy a gun. We should require more strict guidelines to prevent people with mental issues to obtain a gun.

 @9GZH978 from Arkansas  agreed…2yrs2Y

My stance on gun control is the correct stance since this means the mentally ill wont have such access to firearms and the non-mentally ill will have the proper training to understand how to handle the firearm and will help prevent accidental shootings.

 @9GXVFNP from Washington  agreed…2yrs2Y

Several gun incidents are from psychological issues and also tend to be offenders from other charges

 @9G7S8LB from New York  agreed…2yrs2Y

there have been way too many active shooter incidents and mishandling of guns in the U.S. there needs to be training to accidents dont happen so often and psychological tests so weapons arent given out to those who are clearly unhinged.

 @9GZ5WMGProgressive  from Iowa  agreed…2yrs2Y

When you look at big cities that have strict gun laws you can see it works. Most of the mass shootings that will happen in these big cities are from people buying guns in a different state that has very relaxed laws. Traveling the country to the big city and then committing the mass shooting. If the entire country were to have these strict laws it could help all cities and create less shootings.

 @9GZMF7C from Iowa  disagreed…2yrs2Y

It's about the mental health of the people. Right now funding for mental health is not enough, and it's a problem that needs to be addressed right away.

 @9GGK43R from Texas  agreed…2yrs2Y

Supporting strict background checks, psychological testing, and training is vital for effective gun control. Studies show that countries with comprehensive gun control measures have significantly lower rates of firearm-related deaths. Background checks can prevent individuals with criminal records or mental health issues from accessing guns, reducing the risk of violent incidents. Psychological testing and training ensure that gun owners are mentally stable and proficient in firearm handling, promoting responsible ownership. These measures, backed by evidence, prioritize public safety without infringing on citizens' rights, making them essential components of a sensible gun control policy.

 @9GF6PW2 from Arizona  agreed…2yrs2Y

Foreign nations like Japan require strict mental fitness tests and tighter restrictions than America. Statistically, their mass shooting count is significantly less than the US.

 @9G9D7QW from Nebraska  agreed…2yrs2Y

If we were to have more strict background checks we can't really tell how it would go down, but we can predict, and those predictions show homicide rates with firearms going down 20 percent or more. Right now people have a basic 1 day background check to purchase a basic firearm, and most workers if they see the person as unfit to sell to, sell it anyways, because money is money. And big emphasis on the prior military veterans, not that they aren't trust worthy, but a decent amount of mentally unstable, and more likely to take their own life, which is still a very unwanted thing, at least to me.

 @9FPS22X from New York  agreed…2yrs2Y

Every year over the past three years there have been over 600 mass shootings in America. Access to guns is extremely dangerous for public situations. Because of the increase in school shootings, parents are scared and find it unsafe to send their children to school. In 2021, 48,830 people died due to gun related deaths.

 @9H3KQML from Texas  agreed…2yrs2Y

They should have a psych exam and go through multiple training and handling courses. They should also not be allowed to own a gun if they have any red flags in the background check. You should also get references from people outside the family.

 @9FT82SG from Oklahoma  agreed…2yrs2Y

Background check for all people will seek to prevent firearm purchases by individuals thought to be at high risk of presenting a danger to themselves or others. And can prevent tragedies from happening in the first place.

 @9FQGM78agreed…2yrs2Y

You can clearly see in reports that gun voilence in the USA only incresing day by day and with this many mass shootings and school shootings not even the kids are safe even in thier school.

 @9GL8292 from Georgia  agreed…2yrs2Y

Owning a gun is a constitutional right, but there clearly need to be more regulations and steps to the process of acquiring a weapon. School shootings and other disasters might decline if people had to go through more tests and checks. Something that could end another human being's life is not to be taken lightly.

 @9GKFDPP from Kentucky  agreed…2yrs2Y

If people who purchase firearms are given training then they will know how to use the weapon properly, use it safely, and when to use it. If people who purchase guns have a strict background check then based on that check we will be able to learn if they've had a history of violence and if they are to be trusted with such a weapon. If people who purchase guns take a psychological test then it will be determined if this person will try to harm either themselves or others.

 @9G7QWDQ from California  agreed…2yrs2Y

Many instances of gun abuse have been from people who shouldn’t have owned a gun because of their mental state, lack of discipline and training, and ex cons, or racists

 @9FX6VSTIndependent from Texas  agreed…2yrs2Y

The strict background checks prevents anyone with a shaky background to acquire a gun, protecting theorems and others. Psychological testing and training is key to this too because giving guns to people without the proper training and proper mindset leads to an unstable outbreak.

 @9G4QLMS from North Carolina  agreed…2yrs2Y

If you require strict background checks and psychological testing you ensure that people with ill-intentions are much less likely to get access to weaponry, and others know how to manage and safely use said weaponry

 @9H4BF9MLibertarian from Minnesota  agreed…2yrs2Y

No, the phrase “shall not be infringed” is quite clear, however, we can still have laws that manage weapons better.

 @9GD4TDY from Oklahoma  agreed…2yrs2Y

Requiring background checks, psychological testing, and training will prevent more shootings from happening.

 @9GGK4NS from California  agreed…2yrs2Y

With the amount of school shootings around the US almost anyone can obtain a gun when they turn 18 so a good background check and mental testing to see the purpose and mindset of getting a gun can help prevent that

 @9GJDV4F from Texas  agreed…2yrs2Y

I feel like our systems are violently too lax, and objectively bad people have much too easy of access.

 @9FBKK48Democrat from Pennsylvania  agreed…2yrs2Y

More inexperienced and immature people who may have mental problem cause issues with gun violence. These tests would limit firearms out of reach to these people.

 @9FZF5BR from California  agreed…2yrs2Y

People who have ahold of a weapon need to get background checked. We must make sure that those who have that power in their hand do not abuse it and get trigger happy.

 @9GC62TH from South Carolina  agreed…2yrs2Y

asking for background checks, psychological testing, and training can make a big difference and a better understanding of who you're selling the gun to and making sure it doesn't end up in the wrong hands

 @9FZMR3B from Oregon  agreed…2yrs2Y

the best way to help with gun safety is to make sure that the people that get guns legally, they should know how to use it and be in the right state of mind when buying a firearm.

 @9G48D4T from Florida  agreed…2yrs2Y

gun accidents are very common with people that are under the influence, PTSD, or mental illness because of this it is beneficial that we practice doing physiological reviews, background checks, and professional training. Suicides account for 54% of deaths related to firearms, while 43% were homicides

 @9GZQBM5Democrat from California  agreed…2yrs2Y

Although the right to bear arms is protected in the second amendment it is meant for a well regulated militia and not just any person who is not educated in gun saftey.

 @9GQZS66 from Pennsylvania  agreed…2yrs2Y

I believe there should be more background checking on those are who able to purchase guns. I also believe the age should be higher than 18 and have more background on people with mental illness. They could be more likely to kill themselves or harm others with a gun so it is only reasonable to make sure that will not happen. There should be no loopholes and the government should be able to check in to ensure the weapon is being used and cleaned properly.

 @9GJHT7D from Florida  agreed…2yrs2Y

for example in a job they dont get hired until they get a backround check and if their is something wrong with them mentally on the backround check it is taken into account when getting the job and that can save the company from making a big mistake the same way giving a gun to someone you dont know anything about can be bad especically not knowing where their mental stability is at.

 @9GB9X8G from Indiana  agreed…2yrs2Y

Guns are a sensitive topic for a lot of U.S. Americans. I think that they need to go under loads of tests to prove that they are mentally stable to help prevent any further mass shootings.

 @9GGCSNVPeace and Freedom from California  agreed…2yrs2Y

There should be a psych exam. And there should be background checks to see if everything checks out.

 @9H49XN8from Maine  agreed…2yrs2Y

For example, someone with strong depression often puts out a facade they are ok, this is applicable to many mental illnesses such as anxiety that could result in a violent firearm crime

 @9GZPHXN from North Carolina  agreed…2yrs2Y

I think this because a gun can be a lethal weapon and could harm someone if used in the wrong hands or in the wrong way.

 @PATdirk  from Texas  agreed…2yrs2Y

Maybe not required training, but it should not be easy for a criminal to buy a gun especially if they are known for being violent.

 @9H3VMJ3  from Indiana  agreed…2yrs2Y

Regular people do need guns when natural disasters strike and crime raises when criminals seek that opportunity to obtain more stuff. One of the checks on the government by the people is the fact we have guns to help protect us against the most deadly military on the entire planet, our own, when criminals come near you and pull a gun out on you demanding something unjustified, the liberty to self defense is evident, and when it’s a criminal male over a women, a gun can make all the difference evening the odds. In fact in Finland has one of the world’s lenient gun laws, yet has ver…  Read more

 @9GNS2KC from Washington  agreed…2yrs2Y

Criminals will always find a way to have a firearm. Taking them away from functioning citizens will not stop the problem, it may mitigate some harm, but prohibition rarely solves a problem outright.

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

 @9GY75GCagreed…2yrs2Y

A lot of people use guns for criminal use and illegal use. People use them to murder and can cause chaos.

 @9GLW7YJ from Missouri  agreed…2yrs2Y

no body can tell if the person their selling to is a person to entrust responsibility to, or give them the power of a firearm, that's why people need psyche evaluation if their going to own a gun, and have a right to one, as one would have under the Second Amendment.

 @9G9RZHG from New York  agreed…2yrs2Y

I don't have much statistical data, but as a student, I'm very afraid of guns and I want them more regulated, so that it's harder to attack schools.

 @B5WJM7B from California  agreed…3wks3W

Look,I support people having the freedom of having guns but just make sure who is buying a gun and what there reason or reasons of trying to obtain a gun.

 @B5NYBHC from Massachusetts  agreed…1mo1MO

Most shootings, especially in schools, are done by people who illegally bought a gun and didn't go through proper background checks.

 @B3ZCYVB from Tennessee  agreed…4mos4MO

Those who have a history of violence or physiological issues shouldn't be able to have firearms. Additionally I see a lot of people that lack basic firearms safety skills (flagging people, finger on trigger, ect.) and I feel people should have to demonstrate basic knowledge of firearm's safety and handling before you can have one.

 @B3Y67ZC from West Virginia  agreed…4mos4MO

People get killed by guns A LOT. America has more people than guns which is **** ing stupid in my opinion.

 @B35KNTSRepublican from Alabama  agreed…5mos5MO

People who buy guns should undergo training and psycoanalysis testing to prevent school shootings similar to the icelandic mode.

 @B3598JM from Massachusetts  agreed…5mos5MO

Yes, gun control is effective at deterring crime. Strict background checks will prevent mentally ill or dangerous individuals from purchasing firearms.

 @B2YFVQLNo Labels from Washington  agreed…5mos5MO

You have to for a drivers license. In the military you must qualify to hold a weapon. Not everyone can handle a weapon properly.

 @B2SQTK4 from Connecticut  agreed…5mos5MO

Studies show that having a gun in your house makes it it most likely that at some point that gun will be turned back on you

 @B2NN5S7agreed…5mos5MO

Without background checks, psychological testing, etc. there is no guarantee that the person who has the gun will follow the safety procedures that are already in place.

 @B2HJ4SVProgressivefrom Maine  agreed…6mos6MO

When Australia restricted gun regulation in 1996, Firearms deaths dropped immediately by a third, saving over 180 people per year.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...