Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
@8V7ZH4N4yrs4Y
Yes, but only for a court order and if it's necessary to combat terrorism
@8THHY3H4yrs4Y
No, after the immigration crisis
@8TBTW444yrs4Y
Be allowed only after obtaining a warrant to do so on individuals or companies based on suspected criminal activity or other illegal activiities
@8T3M48Q4yrs4Y
Yes and No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
@8SWTWG44yrs4Y
No, end all government surveillance
@8S7YPZC4yrs4Y
it should only be monitored when allowed. "karens" may be harder,but that's just my opinion
@8RG38S94yrs4Y
On a smaller scale because there still should be privacy
@8QMZW454yrs4Y
Yes , but only if they’ve gotten intel on suspicious activity dealing with the person whims phone call they are tapping into
@7L8WQDLIndependent5yrs5Y
Yes but only if they have a warrant
@8PNRKYF5yrs5Y
No, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity
@8PJGGTH5yrs5Y
Yes, only when it is necessary, and not in a way that targets Arabs
@8PB76HW5yrs5Y
Yes, but only people with long criminal and/or terrorist backgrounds
@8P5NL5N5yrs5Y
No, Only if there is a investigation of a group or person
@8H6TDV35yrs5Y
Only when someone is considered a potential threat with irrefutable evidence
@95SGXLC3yrs3Y
Yes, they should be able to monitor anonymized calls and emails which can be de-anonymized by court order.
@8ZDXJZ23yrs3Y
No, it is a violation of our privacy.
@8YCXHRH3yrs3Y
Yes but only when needed
@8W4WKY84yrs4Y
Yes, but only if they suspect some one or a group of people of acts of crime.
@8T9CXXH4yrs4Y
I get that this is a privacy thing which we should have the right to… and it’s creepy and stereotypical that they would listen in. But I really don’t care because I don’t have nothing to hide… can’t say the same for criminals and terrorists
@92XRLDG3yrs3Y
No, only with a warrant and probable cause
@8XDZMW34yrs4Y
Yes, but only for those with violent criminal backgrounds.
@8WMTQZ24yrs4Y
Yes, only if the person is a criminal or suspected terrorist.
@8W3YSN24yrs4Y
Only when its needed as court evidence
@8W3G5LM4yrs4Y
yes to track important stuff but only with permission
@8W376TJ4yrs4Y
Yes, only for those with serious criminal histories, suspects of crimes, or suspects of terrorism.
@8W27P2H4yrs4Y
yes and only use in certain cases as in helping find murderers or stop other crimes from happening, Then after delete the calls and other
@8VRTP694yrs4Y
no but exceptions for Brad <3
@928R9XB3yrs3Y
No. What someone does is not your business unless it's danger talk. I think you could monitor only if your reported for a period of time
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
How does the possibility of having your digital footprint monitored affect your sense of freedom and trust in the government?
@9ZDGKN48mos8MO
This is what makes us hate all governments because we do not feel the freedom that God has given us. Rather, true freedom is just lies, deception, and artificial freedoms.
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
Would you accept more government surveillance if it significantly decreased acts of terror?
@9ZDGKN48mos8MO
What is this stupidity? Does eavesdropping fight terrorism? Hahaha. Are terrorists so stupid that they do not know that their phones are being monitored or that they give away their secrets on the phone? Fighting terrorism has other means and methods. Those who fight terrorism or crime do not commit a crime like them, which is violating people’s privacy.
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
What would you do if you found out your personal messages were being monitored to prevent potential crimes?
@9ZDGKN48mos8MO
A crime like this should happen to them to make them feel how bad this is. As they say, crime begets another crime and with it revenge.
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
Have you ever felt like your privacy was compromised, and if so, what should be the limits of that invasion?
@9ZDGKN4 8mos8MO
Yes, that’s very rude
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
How would you feel if your personal conversations were listened to without your consent for national security?
@9ZDGKN48mos8MO
They should be imprisoned or killed.
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
When, if ever, do you believe the benefits of surveillance outweigh the right to privacy?
@9ZDGKN48mos8MO
Nothing Because no criminal organization or other organization is stupid enough not to know that their phones are being monitored, so they prefer not to say anything dangerous on the phone while you tire yourselves out eavesdropping on them. As for the second matter, which is eavesdropping on ordinary citizens, you will not find anything with them. You will hear the normal talk they say on the street, and you are committing the crime of eavesdropping on them and violating their privacy, and eavesdropping in our time is unacceptable and not part of human advancement.
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@8P6PWZP5yrs5Y
No. This is a violation of privacy.
@buday4vancouver4yrs4Y
No, and all Espionage (CSIS, CSE, et al...) should be banned.
@9ZDGKN4 8mos8MO
No
@7NN387N4yrs4Y
Yes but only for proven terrorists
Join in on more popular conversations.
