Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

19 Replies

 @9FLFKTQ from Missouri  agreed…2yrs2Y

Top Agreement

Stuff like this has happened before, like the great oil leak of the Gulf of Mexico. This incident has left animals affected for decades.

 @9FJDDRS from Arkansas  agreed…2yrs2Y

Rerouting the pipes isn't going to do anything but make more mess. I feel they should cut it off completely and keep our environment healthy.

 @9FRKG39Democrat from Missouri  agreed…2yrs2Y

While many people may go against the Dakota Access Pipeline, it actually is a very successful way of transporting oil.

 @9FTX45W from North Carolina  agreed…2yrs2Y

Scientists estimate it will poison almost 80% of Dakota's water and nature/wildlife with the drilling and extraction of the oil underneath. It is also on land they do not own technically but they are doing it anyway because they are selfish and want the money. It is true that it will produce many jobs in oil, but we can make more jobs for things that help the environment instead of killing it.

 @9GJKVRFDemocrat from California  agreed…2yrs2Y

That's native land that should be protected not only that but it is destroying the environment and on land that is previously protected

 @9ZFN8XG from Texas  agreed…8mos8MO

1. Energy Security and Reliability
The Dakota Access Pipeline is a critical infrastructure project that plays a crucial role in ensuring energy security for the U.S. By providing a reliable and direct transportation route for North American oil (primarily from the Bakken region), DAPL reduces U.S. dependency on foreign oil, which enhances the nation's energy independence. Energy independence reduces vulnerability to geopolitical instability and fluctuations in global oil prices, which can have a direct impact on the economy.

2. Reduced Environmental Impact vs. Alternative Transport
On…  Read more

 @9FSNNQK from Illinois  agreed…2yrs2Y

The benefit of oil can significantly impact our economy, and we all can make money and profit from it.

 @9FSZQYS from California  agreed…2yrs2Y

I can provide you with some additional context, data, and statistics that support the "Yes" position on the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL). It's important to note that the pipeline has been a topic of controversy, and there are both arguments in favor of and against its construction. Here are some points that proponents of DAPL have made:

Energy Security: The Dakota Access Pipeline plays a crucial role in enhancing energy security for the United States. It provides a more direct and efficient route to transport crude oil from the Bakken region in North Dakota to refineries in the…  Read more

 @9FQ3ZK3 from Louisiana  agreed…2yrs2Y

No one wants someone to come onto your land that holds cultural significance and potentially destroy it.

 @9FJ95YR from Utah  disagreed…2yrs2Y

if someone were to come into your community and take everything you know for there own benift you would be angry

 @9FJ8827 from Florida  disagreed…2yrs2Y

If the pipeline is going to effect lands then we should move it somewhere it won’t because it would have the same effect without harming things.

 @9FG4W9J from New Mexico  disagreed…2yrs2Y

I believe that we should be able to build just as long as we are careful and respectful of their burial grounds and the waters surrounding the area.

 @9GNVGQRDemocrat from Georgia  agreed…2yrs2Y

No more pollution should be produced from oil production anywhere in the US especially if it affects Native American tribes.

 @9GKW9C7agreed…2yrs2Y

The Dakota Access Pipeline (or DAPL) was built by Energy Transfer Partners to transport crude oil from the Bakken field in North Dakota to Illinois (https://eelp.law.harvard.edu/).

 @9GGM3XHfrom Maine  agreed…2yrs2Y

we are quickly ruining our countries resources with development form private companies, there are extreme harmful consiquences to letting buissnesses do anything they want as long as the have the money to fund it.

 @9G7QJLR from Missouri  disagreed…2yrs2Y

I frankly do not care or concern myself with this question as it does not pertain to me at this time.

 @9G7R6LZ from Indiana  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Gas prices are being raised due to our lack of ability to access fuel; finishing the pipeline makes cheaper gas for all

 @9G6ZLQ8Democrat from California  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Why does the pipeline need to be in native american lands? Surely we have a way to just make it not enter those areas.

 @9G7BK6P from Arkansas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Progress doesn't happen over-night. We do need to shift our focus on alternative forms of clean energy. This process takes time. Americans are struggling to survive. Today we need jobs, Today we need affordable standards of living, So that tomorrow we can pursue and secure a better future for generations to come.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...