Try the political quiz

38 Replies

 @9NCW7BK from Georgia answered…4hrs4H

No. From what I have seen in the past 10 years - whatever government does fills the pockets of it's grifters and does little to help the needy. The more we get back our individual freedoms and get government out of our lives - the better!!!!!

  @LucidLibertarian  from Oregon answered…11hrs11H

No, but State governments can decide how much funding is provided and under what circumstances.

 @9NBNRNN  from California answered…23hrs23H

 @9N92GYS from North Carolina answered…2 days2D

Yes, but focus the funding more on social services that actually get the homeless off the streets instead of simply subsidizing shelters and possibly perpetuating the problem

 @9N84F8J  from Texas answered…2 days2D

No since none of the money is actually going to fixing the problem & only going into the pockets of politicians and bureaucrats.

 @Meepmeep777 from Texas answered…3 days3D

Yes, house the working and able homeless, institutionalize the mentally ill homeless, and help rehabilitate the addicted homeless.

 @9N7R3PC from Wisconsin answered…3 days3D

 @9N7MXRW from Texas answered…3 days3D

No, Deport illegal immigrants and put the homeless in the housing they've been giving away or paying for

  @ChaseOliver  from South Carolina answered…4 days4D

I sympathize with the need for more shelters and services for the homeless. When government subsidizes these services, incentives shift from providing services that increase the long-term outlook of the homeless population to filling beds to receive more funding.

  @ChaseOliver  from South Carolina answered…4 days4D

No, because when shelters are funded by government, however well-meaning, the incentives of shelter administrators shift from providing better services that aid the long-term outlook of the homeless, to filling beds to receive more funding.

 @9N5WBYD from Oregon answered…4 days4D

 @db from Mississippi answered…4 days4D

No, charity is usually a better for helping people than government/social security.

 @9N37TT9 from Texas answered…5 days5D

 @9N29PFL from New Jersey answered…5 days5D

Funding should go towards rehabilitation centers which could help the homeless find permanent housing and/or employment

 @RWM1999Republican  from Texas answered…6 days6D

 @9MX7N8W from Wisconsin answered…1wk1W

No, they should improve access to psychological evaluation and treatment

 @9MWL2BZLibertarian from California answered…1wk1W

 @9MW9W6B from Arizona answered…1wk1W

Too much money spent on homeless and nothing to show for it. Set up a refuge tent camp and provide services there.

 @9MW35WN from Florida answered…1wk1W

 @9MTZNC4 from North Carolina answered…1wk1W

Yes, as long as the funding is directed towards programs like housing support or skills training that actually help the homeless get back onto their feet and into a position to sustain themselves

 @99M6G59Independent  from Arizona answered…1wk1W

 @9MS62CQLibertarian from Wisconsin answered…1wk1W

I want to say no but I find people don't have enough incentive to do the right thing & privately finance programs

 @9MRY72F from California answered…1wk1W

They should focus on making these shelters and services more effective and efficient first.

 @9MRF6G2 from Texas answered…1wk1W

Yes, just make sure the government focuses on the root cause of homelessness as well.

 @9MQ6LQY from Maryland answered…1wk1W

 @9MPX6ZBfrom Maine answered…1wk1W

Increased mental health facilities, basic necessities, condoms, transition houses, yes. But no legal injection sites or permanent free housing. The homeless need to be boosted up, not kept down.

 @9MPPJNJanswered…1wk1W

 @9MP6K53 from Massachusetts answered…1wk1W

No, and welfare decisions should be increasingly left for state governments to decide

 @9MNQ2RF from Indiana answered…1wk1W

 @9MN3HZG  from California answered…2wks2W

No, funding should try to address the causes of homelessness. Priority should be on creating equal opportunities for homeless to move up the social ladder.

 @9MMGZ2G from California answered…2wks2W

No they should use and account for the money they already have and stop giving away money to non citizens

  @JcawolfsonIndependent  from Pennsylvania answered…2wks2W

Yes, I believe every citizen of the United States should have the right to a decent standard of living, including access to housing, nutrition, and basic necessities

 @Dry550Independent  from Illinois answered…2wks2W

Yes, It may not address the root cause, but it’s a step in providing stability for people who honestly are on hard times

 @8RBQDDPDemocrat  from Vermont answered…2wks2W

Yes but equip them with tools to better help the tenants, and develop them into small villagers where tenants can learn to properly recontribute to society

 @9MLJR34 from Utah answered…2wks2W

Reevaluate how current resources are being allocated and work towards education, financial literacy, and health programs to help homeless in longer term solutions.

 @9MLJ772  from Illinois answered…2wks2W

Yes, it is clearly becoming more of a problem as substance abuse increases. For shelters receiving increases, certain rehabilitative programs should be required.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...