Increased funding would enhance the capacity and quality of shelters and services that provide support for homeless individuals. Proponents argue that it provides essential support for the homeless and helps reduce homelessness. Opponents argue that it is costly and may not address the root causes of homelessness.
@9NCW7BK4hrs4H
No. From what I have seen in the past 10 years - whatever government does fills the pockets of it's grifters and does little to help the needy. The more we get back our individual freedoms and get government out of our lives - the better!!!!!
@LucidLibertarian 11hrs11H
No, but State governments can decide how much funding is provided and under what circumstances.
@9NBNRNN 23hrs23H
Yes, as long as they accept and rehabilitate all drug users
@9N92GYS2 days2D
Yes, but focus the funding more on social services that actually get the homeless off the streets instead of simply subsidizing shelters and possibly perpetuating the problem
@9N84F8J 2 days2D
No since none of the money is actually going to fixing the problem & only going into the pockets of politicians and bureaucrats.
@Meepmeep777 3 days3D
Yes, house the working and able homeless, institutionalize the mentally ill homeless, and help rehabilitate the addicted homeless.
@9N7R3PC3 days3D
Yes, and increase funding to address the root causes of homelessness
@9N7MXRW3 days3D
No, Deport illegal immigrants and put the homeless in the housing they've been giving away or paying for
@ChaseOliver 4 days4D
I sympathize with the need for more shelters and services for the homeless. When government subsidizes these services, incentives shift from providing services that increase the long-term outlook of the homeless population to filling beds to receive more funding.
@ChaseOliver 4 days4D
No, because when shelters are funded by government, however well-meaning, the incentives of shelter administrators shift from providing better services that aid the long-term outlook of the homeless, to filling beds to receive more funding.
@9N5WBYD4 days4D
Yes, and better drug treatment infrastructure should be incentivized.
@db4 days4D
No, charity is usually a better for helping people than government/social security.
@9N37TT95 days5D
Yes, but with a focus on moving those using it away from needing it.
@9N29PFL5 days5D
Funding should go towards rehabilitation centers which could help the homeless find permanent housing and/or employment
@RWM1999Republican 6 days6D
Yes, but I would prefer the local and state governments do this
@9MX7N8W1wk1W
No, they should improve access to psychological evaluation and treatment
@9MWL2BZLibertarian1wk1W
Funding for homeless shelters should be up to non-profit agencies
@9MW9W6B1wk1W
Too much money spent on homeless and nothing to show for it. Set up a refuge tent camp and provide services there.
@9MW35WN1wk1W
This is an issue each local government can decide for themselves.
@9MTZNC41wk1W
Yes, as long as the funding is directed towards programs like housing support or skills training that actually help the homeless get back onto their feet and into a position to sustain themselves
@99M6G59Independent 1wk1W
No, this should be done at the state and local level
@9MS62CQLibertarian1wk1W
I want to say no but I find people don't have enough incentive to do the right thing & privately finance programs
@9MRY72F1wk1W
They should focus on making these shelters and services more effective and efficient first.
@9MRF6G21wk1W
Yes, just make sure the government focuses on the root cause of homelessness as well.
@9MQ6LQY1wk1W
Yes but also make major changes to the shelter system.
@9MPX6ZB1wk1W
Increased mental health facilities, basic necessities, condoms, transition houses, yes. But no legal injection sites or permanent free housing. The homeless need to be boosted up, not kept down.
@9MPPJNJ1wk1W
these should be Independent Catholic voluntary charity programs
@9MP6K531wk1W
No, and welfare decisions should be increasingly left for state governments to decide
@9MNQ2RF1wk1W
No, I think they already have good enough services.
@9MN3HZG 2wks2W
No, funding should try to address the causes of homelessness. Priority should be on creating equal opportunities for homeless to move up the social ladder.
@9MMGZ2G2wks2W
No they should use and account for the money they already have and stop giving away money to non citizens
@JcawolfsonIndependent 2wks2W
Yes, I believe every citizen of the United States should have the right to a decent standard of living, including access to housing, nutrition, and basic necessities
@Dry550Independent 2wks2W
Yes, It may not address the root cause, but it’s a step in providing stability for people who honestly are on hard times
Yes but equip them with tools to better help the tenants, and develop them into small villagers where tenants can learn to properly recontribute to society
@9MLJR342wks2W
Reevaluate how current resources are being allocated and work towards education, financial literacy, and health programs to help homeless in longer term solutions.
@9MLJ772 2wks2W
Yes, it is clearly becoming more of a problem as substance abuse increases. For shelters receiving increases, certain rehabilitative programs should be required.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...