High density housing refers to housing developments with a higher population density than average. For example, high rise apartments are considered high density, especially in comparison to single-family homes or condominiums. High density real estate can also be developed from empty or abandoned buildings. For instance, old warehouses can be renovated and turned into luxury lofts. Further, commercial buildings that are no longer in use can be refitted into high-rise apartments. Opponents argue that more housing will lower the value of their home (or rental units) and change the “character” of neighborhoods. Proponents argue that the buildings are more environmentally friendly than single family homes will lower housing costs for people who cannot afford large homes.
@9LTDTR81wk1W
Yes, but in conjunction w/other initiatives to ensure this housing is adjacent to good public schools, health clinics, parks, community centers, addiction centers & affordable grocery & other stores/services required to live a balanced, healthy life.
@9LW3ZGY1wk1W
bit more nuanced than just yes or no - if constructing high density residential buildings their should be appropriate spaces such as balconies/communal gardens, this kind of space is often neglected when planning the building of such places
@9M5Q2TD7hrs7H
Yes, but don't take away available land. take areas that are run down like warehouses or create tiny home options in a community area.
@9M5LXFR11hrs11H
Yes, but not in an area where the locals believe the above mentioned "character" of their neighborhoods will be harmed.
No, instead of incentivizing for-profit companies we should socialize housing to make sure that having the dignity of a place to live is a respected human right.
@9M5D2G8Republican17hrs17H
I think the construction of high density buildings will simply lead to the exacerbation of current issues we have with poverty as cheaper housing is a good thing it doesn't necessarily address the root causes of some problems. it would also heavily depend on the areas in which housing is built as it might affect rural areas with the current increase of suburban sprawl
@9M5CQVY17hrs17H
Should utilize mixed density and mixed zoning. Revise the current zoning laws to make them less strict.
@9M55CG4 20hrs20H
Yes and no if a landowner does not want to sell out the government should not have the right to claim eminent domain.
@9M4XFT523hrs23H
high density in the way of high population, no. We should not be cramming people into buildings like overcrowded chickens.
@9M4SWCQ1 day1D
Yes, if there are strict guidelines ensuring that the buildings will be safe for everyone to live in
@9M4L4GM1 day1D
Incentivize more affordable housing as well as city planning when it comes to public transportation and less reliance on automobiles.
Sure BUT high density housing doesn't solve housing problems when people can't afford to live in the new buildings. They need to be affordable.
@9M4JYC41 day1D
Yes, but having regulations against rent increases of new or existing residents of the surrounding areas.
@9M4J29S1 day1D
Yes, but they should also require a certain percentage of the homes/condos to be sold to individuals (as opposed to all being rentals)
@9M4GMBC 1 day1D
i believe that we are building to many building and there isnt alot of green so we should build building that can hold a large capacity of people.
@9M4H9T21 day1D
No. Because nonprofit private developers end up owning these building paid for by the taxpayer. People can live in rural areas for cheap or smaller units if the market demands it.
@9M4F2PR2 days2D
Renovate existing abandoned buildings, use them to house the homeless, and incorporate programs to enable the homeless to gain wealth to eventually own their own home or apartments. This could be done in phases. A community to meet the immediate needs of the homeless to help them become productive members of communities, then they can move to a community of work and pay affordable rent, which will eventually enable them to professional development and opportunity allowing them to move into "normal" societal area/neighborhoods/communities/home ownership.
@9M4BD822 days2D
Use the unused spaces, like empty schools and other store types, to turn into low income housing with assistance, or even as homeless space to stay. Stop building new stuff when we have too many empty buildings already.
@9M49HF82 days2D
Only if necessary according to the density of the population and the number of those who would have a better condition of living if in high density residential buildings.
@9M44JLQ2 days2D
There should be a limitation to how many people are living within one area. But to be more compact isn’t a bad idea
@9M3XVV92 days2D
Yes, and make sure rent is kept in a reasonable and affordable range as to not further push the concern of possible homelessness that many face
@9M3KMPP2 days2D
i feel like they can turn all these runned down places into new homes and stuff for people who dont have them however they dont have to make it luxerious
there has to be a better way than creating more projects but the government should incentivize affordable housing for all
@9M3BYHGConstitution2 days2D
Some should be available bug homes also should be renovated. People deserve to own a home if they work. Not energize wants to be stuffed in a tiny apartment.
No, instead of this the government should regulate the amount of properties you can own so tons of houses that could be used to house the homeless aren't sitting empty.
@9M2SG233 days3D
I think the government should encourage lowering the birth rate. We're full to bursting on this planet. And we don't have a plane B.
@9M2HQBSLibertarian3 days3D
I think the government should incentivize people to move out to more rural areas to spread the population out. Which, would provide more funding and education opportunities for people in that area.
@9M2FKHW3 days3D
Yes, and the government should be able to use the concept of eminent domain if met with remarkable resistance.
@9M2F6J93 days3D
Yes, but make sure that they are well built and environmentally friendly in order to reduce their environmental impact. This decreases the population that is homeless.
@9M22HM63 days3D
Yes, only if the proposed housing is affordable for the residents who currently live in the area at the time the project is approved
@9LZW3863 days3D
Yes, if public transportation/roads are expanded to handle the increased amount of people living in the area prior to residents moving in.
@9LZK2TN4 days4D
yes to a certain extent. its ok to add some new housing to high density areas but adding to much will bring in more people and then it will start getting over crowded.
@9LZJ7YF4 days4D
I believe that if a building is no longer in use for that purpose why not turn it in to an apartment but if it is still in use and doing its purpose to let it keep doing what it’s doing
@9LZCBBV4 days4D
Yes, but it should depend on the area. Highly populated cities would benefit from something like this. But, it is also important to leave space for parks and other public spaces. They should also be constructed at least considerably close to schools, hospitals, etc,
@9LZ4SF3Republican4 days4D
Only in certain areas. In highly populated cities, this is more effective, such as New York City, but in places like Texas, it's not needed because of the number of land people have and how expensive it is to build and stay in an apartment, whereas in Texas, housing options are cheaper in comparison to New York. It would make more sense to buy a house there.
@9LZ42YB4 days4D
Yes, but while doing this other things should be considered. Such as healthcare availability, safety, schooling, and the thought of how such buildings will fit into communities, make sure it is less of a burden and actually helps people.
@9LYZ3B64 days4D
Only if the agreements are run through an audited non profit entity subject to salary caps on all higher executives.
We need to utilize the homes we already have, we have no shortage of empty homes but we have a shortage of homes that are not hoarded or too expensive.
@9LYVJ9ZCA Common Sense4 days4D
given how big the U.S. is as a whole, it would be stupid not to utilize disposable land to give everyone a decent amount of space. lets not make another Kowloon City.
@9LYNLSWWomen’s Equality4 days4D
Personally, I believe rent and the cost of mortgage should be lowered to allow for people to be able to afford to live wherever they want.
@9LYNHYY4 days4D
No, there are already plenty of empty apartments. We don’t need to build more, we need to fill the ones we have.
@9LYJWLX4 days4D
No, I think there should be a regulation on the operations of homeless shelters to ensure safety and privacy to the best of the shelter's ability- in order to protect and provide for those without homes that do not feel that a shelter is what is best for their own personal wellbeing
@9LY9QSQ5 days5D
Yes, but they also have to have a scientifically proven amount of nature incorporated in the design of the buildings. And they should prioritize the collaboration of any small business the tenants have to build brick and mortar shops.
@9LY74S85 days5D
Only if costs go down so this will actually solve problems. Also, emphasis on "Incentivize" not "fund"
@9LY2YWW 5 days5D
Yes in areas that are seeing an increase in residents and homelessness and maybe even have programs that can get homeless people off their feet and a temporary home. Some places do not always need to be build up.
@9LXY4G35 days5D
Yes, but it should be focused on rennovating existing structures and maintaining good quality not developing new land and choking out the skyline.
@9LXVR7X5 days5D
Sure, but please make sure that there are safety measures for migrating birds and clearing the air that is produced.
@9LXSHCMWomen’s Equality5 days5D
The market prices are too high and interest rates are insane. People should be able to by a home with their over min wage income. This should be an issue.
@9LXPXM95 days5D
No, but the government should regulate and lower the pricing of housing or provide finanical aid for those seeking to own a house but struggle with finances.
@9LXP64DProgressive5 days5D
The government should decrease the inflation of housing costs and limit how many family homes that large companies can purchase and rent
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...